Questions and Answers > Question:You work with the pricing actuary at Cash for Claims, a large Property/Casualty insurer.The CEO has some questions based on the most recent pricing analysis and the pricingactuary has asked you to assist with the response. The proposed rates were not in therange the CEO expected given the pricing analysis. The CEO has asked the pricingactuary to verify the total projected loss cost excluding potential large storm losses for2020. In turn, the pricing actuary has asked you to independently calculate theprojected costs. All policies are 12-month policies. The rates will take effect July 1,2020 and will be in effect for one year. In 2017 there was a large storm resulting in anadditional 230 storm-related claims averaging 30,000 each. The company was able tosettle 40% of all total claim liabilities relating to those claims within 2017 with theremainder being paid out in 2018. All other claims are completely settled by the end ofyear 4. The pricing actuary determined trend factors using the least squares methodand determined the projected loss cost based on the loss costs for 2018 and 2019 withweightings of 40% and 60% respectively. You are to use the same methodology. Thedata and underlying model are in the Excel worksheet . Your response should beformatted as an internal memorandum to the pricing actuary and should include theAfterprojected loss costs for 2018 and 2019. That's all the data and information I have.agreeing that the previous pricing analysis was accurate, the CEO commented that theinitially proposed rates per 1,000 have increased much higher than both the trend you haddetermined and the overall industry trend for losses. Discuss two to four factors that may bedriving this. What possible actions could the insurer take to reduce rates for next year andbeyond? What are the considerations that would need to be made with each of these actions?Please format your response as an email to the CEO.


Cambridge High School, Cambridge ECON 001 Question: You work with the pricing actuary at Cash for Claims, a large Property/Casualty insurer. The CEO has some questions based on the most recent pricing analysis and the pricing actuary has asked you to assist with the response. The proposed rates were not in the range the CEO expected given the pricing analysis. The ...[Show More]

Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Purchase this document to unlock the blurred part and the rest of the document

Unlock Now

Reviews( 0 )

Unlock this Document

Purchase the document to unlock it.

$5.00

Unlock Now

0
0

Category: Questions and Answers
Number of pages: 4
Language: English
Last updated: 1 month ago
Downloads: 0
Views: 0

Can't Find what you want?

PLACE CUSTOM WRITING ORDER

Related documents


6 Pages

Questiontt
21 marks) On slide 35 of Lecture 7, some examples of possible security performance measurements were offered. Please read the first 2 pages (pp. 48-49) of the attached paper titled "Metrics for Information Security Vulnerabilities". The paper offers some criteria for defining a good metric. Are there any metrics from slide 35, Lecture 7, which in your opinion do not meet the criteria of Repeatability and Easiness? If so, why? (Slide 35 of Lecture 7) Table 7-4 Examples of possible security performance measurements •Percentage of the organization's information systems budget devoted to InfoSec •Percentage of high vulnerabilities mitigated within organizationally defined time periods after discovery •Percentage space of remote access points used to gain unauthorized access •Percentage of information systems personnel who have received security training •Average frequency of audit records review and analysis for inappropriate activity •Percentage of new systems that have completed C&A prior to their implementation •Percentage of approved and implemented configuration changes identified in the latest automated baseline configuration •Percentage of information systems that have conducted annual contingency plan testing •Percentage of users with access to shared accounts •Percentage of incidents reported within required time frame per applicable incident category •Percentage of system components that undergo maintenance in accordance with formal maintenance schedules •Percentage of media that passes sanitization procedures testing •Percentage of physical security incidents allowing unauthorized entry into facilities containing information assets •Percentage of employees who are authorized access to information systems only after they sign an acknowledgement that they have read and understood the appropriate policies •Percentage of individuals screened before being granted access to organizational information and information systems •Percentage of vulnerabilities remediated within organizationally specified time frames •Percentage of system and service acquisition contracts that include security requirements and/or specifications •Percentage of mobile computers and devices that perform all cryptographic operations using organizationally specified cryptographic modules operating in approved modes of operations •Percentage of operating system vulnerabilities for which patches have been applied or that have been otherwise mitigated.