London Met

• COMPUTING CS3101

• Higher Nationals Internal verification of assessment decisions – BTEC (RQF) INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS Programme title Assessor Internal Verifier Unit(s) Unit 13: Computing Research Project Assignment title Final Research Student’s name List which assessment criteria the Assessor has awarded. Pass Merit Distinction INTERNAL VERIFIER CHECKLIST Do the assessment criteria awarded match those shown in the assignment brief? Y/N Is the Pass/Merit/Distinction grade awarded justified by the assessor’s comments on the student work? Y/N Has the work been assessed accurately? Y/N Is the feedback to the student: Give details: • Constructive? • Linked to relevant assessment criteria? • Identifying opportunities for improved performance? • Agreeing actions? Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Does the assessment decision need amending? Y/N Assessor signature Date Internal Verifier signature Date Programme Leader signature(if required) Date Confirm action completed Remedial action taken Give details: Assessor signature Date Internal Verifier signature Date Programme Leader signature(if required) Date Higher Nationals – Summative Assignment Feedback Form Student Name/ID HIMESHA WALAKULPOLA COL/A-064124 Unit Title Assignment Number Assessor Submission Date Date Received 1st submission Re-submission Date Date Received 2nd submission Assessor Feedback: LO2 Conduct and analyse research relevant to a chosen computing research project Pass, Merit & Distinction P3 P4 M2 D1 Descripts LO3 Communicate the outcomes of a research project to identified stakeholders Pass, Merit & Distinction P5 M3 D2 Descripts LO4 Reflect on the application of research methodologies and concepts Pass, Merit & Distinction P6 P7 M4 D3 Descripts Grade: Assessor Signature: Date: ResubmissionFeedback: Grade: Assessor Signature: Date: Internal Verifier’s Comments: Signature & Date: * Please note that grade decisions are provisional. They are only confirmed once internal and external moderation has taken place and grades decisions have been agreed at the assessment board. Assignment Feedback Formative Feedback: Assessor to Student Action Plan Summative feedback Feedback: Student to Assessor Assessor signature Date Student signature Date Pearson Higher Nationals in Computing Unit 13: Computing Research Project Assignment 01 General Guidelines 1. A Cover page or title page – You should always attach a title page to your assignment. Use previous page as your cover sheet and be sure to fill the details correctly. 2. This entire brief should be attached in first before you start answering. 3. All the assignments should prepare using word processing software. 4. All the assignments should print in A4 sized paper, and make sure to only use one side printing. 5. Allow 1” margin on each side of the paper. But on the left side you will need to leave room for binging. Word Processing Rules 1. Use a font type that will make easy for your examiner to read. The font size should be 12 point, and should be in the style of Time New Roman. 2. Use 1.5 line word-processing. Left justify all paragraphs. 3. Ensure that all headings are consistent in terms of size and font style. 4. Use footer function on the word processor to insert Your Name, Subject, Assignment No, and Page Number on each page. This is useful if individual sheets become detached for any reason. 5. Use word processing application spell check and grammar check function to help edit your assignment.